Use Case: Impact Analysis & Submission Readiness with a Regulatory Knowledge Graph
Why This Use Case Matters
The Vivid Scenario
Change Event: A design change order (ECO) is approved for a surgical device component.
Regulatory Questions:
- Which global submissions reference this component?
- Which requirements, risks, and tests are impacted?
- Which evidence documents are missing or outdated?
Today (Manual)
- 80–120 hours/submission digging across systems.
- Weeks of delays in responses.
- High risk of findings during regulatory audits.
With a Graph
- Single query returns all impacted submissions across markets.
- Linked risks, requirements, and tests identified instantly.
- Readiness score highlights missing or outdated evidence.
- Evidence packet automatically assembled for regulator response.
Our Solution
Data Intelligence Capabilities Applied:
Business Value (Example Calculation)
Baseline: 120 hours/submission for impact analysis & evidence gathering.
With Graph: ~24 hours/submission (80% reduction).
Assumptions:
- Analyst cost = $90/hour
- 150 submissions/year per division
- ~20 global divisions
Formula: Savings/Subm = (Baseline Hours − With Graph Hours) × Hourly Cost
Savings:
- 96h saved × $90 = $8,640 per submission
- $8,640 × 150 submissions = $1.3M saved annually per division
- 20 divisions × $1.3M = ~$26M annual global savings
Additional upside: every week faster = millions in incremental device revenue.
Key Metrics (Expected Impact)
~80%
Reduction in effort per submission
~$26M
Annual global labor savings
Higher
Audit‑readiness & compliance
Key Message
Every regulator query currently consumes thousands of hours in manual evidence assembly. A Regulatory Knowledge Graph reduces weeks of work to minutes — unlocking $25M+ in annual savings, strengthening compliance, and accelerating approvals. Compliance shifts from a cost center to a source of competitive advantage.